By now you know that we did not attend today's (March 16 at 2 pm) performance. Our seats were Orchestra C6 and C8. We tried awfully hard to get there. We left Santa Cruz at 11:15 am. We were on the 6th Street Exit from 101 into San Francisco by 12:30 pm. We were heading for the recommended parking garage at 325 Mason Street.
Saturday, March 16, 2019
San Franciso St. Patrick's Day
By now you know that we did not attend today's (March 16 at 2 pm) performance. Our seats were Orchestra C6 and C8. We tried awfully hard to get there. We left Santa Cruz at 11:15 am. We were on the 6th Street Exit from 101 into San Francisco by 12:30 pm. We were heading for the recommended parking garage at 325 Mason Street.
Wednesday, February 01, 2017
Why can't Sir Francis Drake report to me?
Why can't I have staff like Sir Francis Drake?
Top Ten Reasons InterWorking Labs is a Superior Company Compared to Apple
#1 When a customer calls us about a repair, we listen to what she says about how she diagnosed the problem, and actually interact with her and give consideration to her findings.
#2 When we replace a defective unit, we do not provide a replacement unit with an obsolete version of the operating system. We upgrade the replacement product to the latest version of our software.
#3 When we replace a defective unit, we do not provide a replacement with an EARLIER serial number, meaning an older product, than the customer's product that needs repair. Instead we provide an equivalent or later product.
#4 Most Apple employees could never get a job at InterWorking Labs because our standards are much higher. Below is the equivalency table:
Apple Technical Guru (unstaffed) = InterWorking Labs senior engineer
Apple Genius Bar Worker = InterWorking Labs average employee
Apple Average Employee = would never be hired at InterWorking Labs
#5 Our employees do not use cutesy names for standard products; they never call a USB connector a "camera kit".
#6 Our employees know what a USB connector is.
#7 We do not make our customers who are covered by warranty, sign a document that describes the cost of the repair outside of the warranty period or service agreement coverage. We are grateful for our customers and their business. We believe our customers who are covered by warranty or a service agreement already understand the value of the warranty or service agreement and that's why they have it. We fix or replace the product and return it to the customer without any editorial comments.
#8 When InterWorking Labs customers contact us with a product problem, we do not tell them that they can only communicate with us in a "positive" manner. InterWorking Labs does not dictate the emotional tone of our customers' communications.
#9 When InterWorking Labs customers return a product for repair, we do not examine all the connector openings with an otoscope to see if there is water damage. We do not believe our customers would use a network emulator or protocol tester in the shower or the bath tub.
#10 When a customer tells us that he needs to speak with someone with deeper technical knowledge to get questions answered, we find the appropriate staff engineer and arrange the communication. We do not take our lack of deep technical knowledge personally and we do not tell the customer "you are not a very nice person".
In spite of all of the above, I continue to use my replacement iPad.
Thursday, December 08, 2016
How to Fix Wells Fargo Bank
So while this mess winds its way through various congressional hearings, investigations, lawsuits, and so on, what can Wells Fargo do now to regroup and refocus?
The answer is that Wells Fargo can invest in expert systems. Specifically, Wells Fargo can construct an automated system to replace the decision making ability of expensive expert humans – in particular CPAs and accountants. Wells Fargo would then package this as a service to sell its customers.
I run a small tech company. I’ve been a client of Wells Fargo for more than ten years. Wells Fargo is our third bank, after the first two proved inadequate. Wells Fargo dazzled us with excellent back-end processes and systems, well-trained staff, and prompt error correction.
Occasionally, I interact with the Wells Fargo sales team, but:
(1) The sales team tries to sell me services I do not need – typically, a new service to replace an existing service for a tiny savings.
(2) The sales team never asks me the key questions they should ask:
- What is the biggest challenge for your company related to your banking and financial activity?
- What would it mean to your business if we could solve that problem for you?
- What do you estimate that would save you in terms of time and expense?
If Wells Fargo posed these questions to its small and medium sized businesses, a pattern would emerge; all of us spend far too much time on accounting and tax matters. Yes we have bookkeepers and accountants and CPAs, but we are still dragged into these matters far more than we should be.
Our Company is not unique; Wells Fargo has 100% of our financial data – all of our bank accounts and all of our company credit cards. So …
- Why do we have to transfer that data out of Wells Fargo’s system and into our accounting system?
- Why do we have to massage the accounting system to classify the transactions and enter other details?
- Why do we have to spend time answering questions from the bookkeeper, the accountant and the CPA?
Wells Fargo can take advantage of its unique position of possessing all its business clients’ financial data to prepare preliminary financial reports, that the CPA could easily review and use to prepare the tax filings required of small and medium corporations.
How would this be done?
Wells Fargo could create an expert system to analyze and interpret all of the financial data along with chat bots (or software wizards) to get answers to questions for financial processing.For example, let’s suppose that the business owner purchased a set of office cubicles and related furniture for $15,000 to go into a new office area. She may have purchased via check or credit card. Ideally, the memo field on the paper check would state “Office Furniture” as a description of the purchase. When the check is presented to Wells Fargo for payment, the Wells Fargo expert system would transfer funds appropriately, read the entry in the memo field, and either classify the purchase as:
1420 – Furniture & Fixtures, a Fixed Asset, or
6552 – Office Expense, an Expense
Well, which would it be? It depends on the “Fixed Asset threshold”. At our company, purchases over $1,000 meet the Fixed Asset threshold. The Wells Fargo expert system would check this and then classify the purchase as 1420 – Furniture & Fixtures, a Fixed Asset.
Some areas, with extra complexity, would require CPA review. Fixed asset depreciation, for example, could use multiple methods, spanning multiple years. Pre-paid expenses spanning multiple years would also require CPA input. But so what? Just flag those areas for CPA review and let the Wells Fargo’ expert system handle the bulk of the accounting.
The office cubicles example is just one of hundreds of different types of accounting issues that businesses must track and record. Each one of these little nuisances results in the energy-sucking, time-sucking drag of accounting on small and medium businesses.
Occasionally, the system’s “chat bot” or software wizard would ask whether or not any fixed assets had been disposed of in the previous month (it needs to know this for the annual Business Property Report required by some government jurisdictions). The business owner or the office manager would think about this for ten seconds and then answer the question. No fuss. No muss.
The point is that the expert system is handling 90% of the work previously done by the business owner/office manager, bookkeeper, accountants, and CPA. Additionally, the expert system could produce a standardized report in a format easily scanned by a CPA for accuracy.
What would it take to implement this?
The project requires tax and accounting experts and software developers. Initial design and development could be accelerated by using expert system and machine learning technology.The service would require extensive BETA testing. It would require frequent updates as tax and accounting laws change. In addition, Wells Fargo would need to address regulatory hurdles and liability issues.
Will the new Wells Fargo service eliminate bookkeepers, accountants and CPAs?
The service removes the drudgery aspects of the work, allowing financial professionals to contribute more value to the corporation by providing business advice like tax mitigation strategies and consultation about other business areas. The bookkeeper can negotiate better deals with current and new suppliers.
So what are we waiting for? Wells Fargo needs to engage with its customers, use technology to find solutions to customer problems, package solutions as services and deploy the services to its customers. And, Wells Fargo can start immediately on this expert system!
Friday, June 13, 2014
My Second DMCA Take Down Notice
For the second time, a Google Blogger account called "SW Test Engineers" has published a blog article that is a word for word copy of one of our company's web pages!
InterWorking Labs provides network emulation and protocol testing products. We educate prospective clients and the general public on issues related to network failures by writing technical white papers.
One of our white papers, "Network Protocol Testing Overview - InterWorking Labs" was copied word for word, along with the graphics and images!
Here's the white paper:
http://iwl.com/white-papers/network-protocol-testing
SW Test Engineers has copied it and published it here:
http://swtestengineers.blogspot.com/2013/02/protocol-testing.html
This is the second time SW Test Engineers has copied our material! The first time they copied this page:
http://iwl.com/component/content/article/87-protocol-testing/372-testing-the-tcp-ip-dhcp-protocols
I submitted the notification of infringing material after searching for "Reporting copyright infringement on Blogger" and going to this page:
https://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905?hl=en
I followed the procedure. Last time it took two weeks to get it taken down. A few weeks later, SW Test Engineers infringed again!
According to Google:
"Many Google Services do not have account holders or subscribers. For Services that do, Google will, in appropriate circumstances, disable the accounts of repeat infringers.
If you believe that an account holder or subscriber is a repeat infringer, please follow the instructions above to contact Google's DMCA agent and provide information sufficient for us to verify that the account holder or subscriber is a repeat infringer."
Unfortunately, despite the language in the above paragraph, there are no instructions for contacting Google's DMCA agent.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
My first DMCA Takedown filed at Google
InterWorking Labs provides network emulation and protocol testing products. One of our products, the Maxwell Network Emulator, has a set of protocol tests for the TCP, IP, UDP, DHCP, ICMP protocols. A description of this product is here:
http://iwl.com/component/content/article/87-protocol-testing/372-testing-the-tcp-ip-dhcp-protocols
SW Test Engineers has copied it and published it here:
http://swtestengineers.blogspot.com/2012/02/testing-tcp-ip-icmp-dhcp-protocols.html?showComment=1389898903465
I submitted the notification of infringing material after searching for "Reporting copyright infringement on Blogger" and going to this page:
https://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905?hl=en
I followed the procedure. I wonder how long this will take?
Also, just to drive home the point, I posted a comment on the SW Test Engineers blog that it was infringing material.
I believe that every occurrence of a registered copyright violation (and our web pages ARE registered with the copyright office) is entitled to damages in the amount of $20,000.
Just received the automated response from Google:
-------- Original Message --------
| Subject: | Re: [8-0250000002609] Your Request to Google |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:14:26 +0000 |
| From: | removals@google.com |
| To: | Chris Wellens |
Hi,
Thanks for reaching out to us!
We have received your legal request. We receive many such complaints each day; your message is in our queue, and we'll get to it as quickly as our workload permits.
Due to the large volume of requests that we experience, please note that we will only be able to provide you with a response if we determine your request may be a valid and actionable legal complaint, and we may respond with questions or requests for clarification. For more information on Google's Terms of Service, please visit http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS
We appreciate your patience as we investigate your request.
Regards,
The Google Team
--------------It is interesting that Google takes this approach. I would prefer to have the contact information for the legal representative of the infringer, and then turn my lawyers loose on it and pocket the $20,000 times the number of page views.
Seems like some enterprising lawyers could make a nice business out of this.
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
Listening to "The Things They Carried" with Audible
I downloaded an audio book called "The Things They Carried" by the writer, Tim O'Brien. This is a novel and auto-biography of sorts, about a young man's life prior to and during the VietNam war starting in 1968.
Normally, I would have no interest in this -- just not my cup of tea. HOWEVER, the actor Bryan Cranston, was reading it. That got me interested.
Well... this novel is just fantastic. I am loving it. Bryan Cranston reads so well and prepared so well that he even pronounces the word Bemidji correctly. (The name of a city in Minnesota).
The subject matter is very macho. Having a professional actor who plays macho roles reading the book contributes to the overall effect.
Thumbs up for Audible!
